subscribe: Posts | Comments

Wto Multi Fibre Agreement


At the beginning of 2005, China`s exports of textiles and clothing to the West increased by 100% or more in many respects, leading the United States and the EU to highlight China`s WTO accession agreements, which allowed them to limit the growth rate to 7.5% per year until 2008. In June, China agreed with the EU to limit the rate to 10% for three years. No such agreement was reached with the United States, which reported its own import growth rate of 7.5%. [Citation required] 2. A chronology of the events that led to the multifibre agreement International trade policy has for many decades used quantitative import restrictions as a means of achieving specific development outcomes. This form of protection provides local industry with limited protection from foreign competition, which would have been the case if foreign products were in free competition in the domestic market. Quotas are fundamentally different from other policy instruments, such as tariffs, because they limit import competition, regardless of direct price considerations. In other words, quotas remove part of the incentive for foreign suppliers to compete on price despite import duties, because quantitative restrictions completely remove costs and prices from the equation. In monitoring the evolution of the Multifibre Agreement (MFA) and, later, the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), it should be stressed that quantitative restrictions on textiles and clothing are contrary to the original word and spirit of certain basic principles contained in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). After it came into force in early 1948, the agreement contained provisions relating, directly or indirectly, to quantitative restrictions. Thus, Article XI (general elimination of quantitative restrictions) explicitly prohibits quantitative restrictions (and related export and import licences), except in a small number of exceptional circumstances (for example.

B export restrictions to temporarily alleviate food shortages in the country). In addition, Articles I (general treatment of the nation`s most favoured nation) and XIII (non-discriminatory management of quantitative restrictions) stipulate that countries` trade policy measures must not discriminate between supplier countries. In the United States (United States), early trade restrictions on the textile and clothing sector took the form of a domestic agricultural policy that limited cotton imports.

Comments are closed.